"Boom Times for New Times: Skilled in the ways of proxy fights and
leveraged buyouts, Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin hope to forge a national
chain of alternative newspapers."
Forbes, October 14, 1991
(The complete text of this article is not available online)
"It's hard to imagine how two business partners could appear to be
so different," Forbes' William P. Barrett wrote of Jim Larkin and
Michael Lacey, heads of the business and editorial sides,
respectively, of New Times Inc.
The October 1991 Forbes piece focused on the "terrific combo" of
Larkin and Lacey, who in twenty years had taken New Times from an
anti-war protest paper to the nation's largest publisher by circulation
of alternative weekly newspapers. (And that was when the company
published just Phoenix New Times, Westword in Denver, and Miami New
Times.) Along the way, there were some nasty battles, including a
"bruising fight that featured a showdown shareholders meeting straight
out of the movies" in 1977, and a once "staggering debt-to-equity
ratio."
"With revenues in the year ended June 30 [1991] of $16 million and
profits of about $2.5 million, New Times Inc. is still pretty
insignificant change in the world of newspaper publishing," reported
Barrett. "On the other hand, the country's 100 or so alternative
papers, most of them dumped in vending boxes and distributed free, do
account for one of publishing's few growth areas as many dailies and
city magazines founder from high overhead and an inability to appeal
to readers.
"Straitlaced Larkin, who looks after New Times Inc.'s business
side, and mercurial Lacey, who runs the editorial side, are doing a
good job exploiting this situation."
In Phoenix, Barrett wrote, "the paper's vaguely populist, often
contrarian coverage has become must reading for local business people
as well as students and aging hippies. Editorially, at least, the
paper is now serious competition for the Arizona Republic and the
Phoenix Gazette." And advertising sales for the New Times papers were
so healthy that Larkin and Lacey had just closed their biggest
deal--purchasing the Dallas Observer for an estimated $3 million.
The company didn't plan to stop there. Larkin, Barrett reported,
"is confident that over time he and Lacey will build a $100 million
company, partly by buying papers from their about-to-retire founders.
Even the liberals who own alternative media like to cash in when given
the chance."
< < Back to Press Clips
"Houston Press Is Set to Rise as Post Folds,"
The Wall Street Journal's Texas Journal, April 26, 1995
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee at www.wsj.com)
"When the 115-year-old Houston Post abruptly shut down last week,"
wrote Laura Johannes, staff reporter of the Wall Street Journal, "more
than 100 upset residents took to the phones. They were calling the
Houston Press."
New Times Inc. had bought the Houston Press in November 1993, two
years after it bought the Dallas Observer. Now, as in Dallas when the
Times Herald shut down, the publishing company was in the perfect
position to benefit from the loss of another daily. "We knew we could
make it with or without the Post," New Times CEO James Larkin told the
Journal. "But without the Post we will do it better, quicker."
The paper already had its admirers in Houston, "who see the Press
providing an iconoclastic alternative to the more staid Chronicle,"
the Journal reported. "But there's more than just editorial content at
stake. The Post's demise leaves a lot of advertising dollars up for
grabs." Larkin said he hoped to siphon off 2 to 5 percent of them,
increasing the Press's ad revenue by as much as 50 percent.
Overall, New Times' revenues have grown 20 percent a year for the
past decade, "with revenue for its six papers nationwide expected to
hit $50 million in 1995," according to Larkin.
< < Back to Press Clips
"An Alternative to the Denver Dailies: Westword enjoys going up
against its more established competition."
Editor & Publisher, October 21, 1995
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee at www.mediainfo.com)
"Alternative weeklies have made a sport out of criticizing their
daily counterparts," wrote E&P's Tony Case. "But Denver's Westword
prefers beating to berating its more established competition."
The seventeen-year-old Westword goes "head-to-head with the Denver
Post and Rocky Mountain News on local stories and has shown up the
other guys on more than one occasion," Case continued. "Recently, it
scooped the dailies on a story that made national news: the
malfunctioning baggage system at Denver's new multibillion-dollar
airport."
The dailies missed that story, according to Westword editor and
founder Patricia Calhoun, bcause they'd fallen into "boosterism for
the new airport." But they'd also wrongly subscribed to the newspaper
industry's "dumbing-down trend," and they'd made a mistake in
underestimating their readers.
"I think people in Denver are very intelligent, no matter what line
of work they're in," Calhoun told E&P. "They're interested in the city
and they like to read, and they want more depth than they're getting
in the dailies."
< < Back to Press Clips
"Weeklies Warring in the City of Angels,"
New York Times, September 16, 1996
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee from New York Times through Lexis-Nexis)
"As alternative papers grow in circulation and revenue even as some
dailies struggle, success is reshaping the industry," reported Andrea
Adelson in the Los Angeles Times. "New empires are emerging, breeding
enmity among a once-collegial group. Los Angeles is the first
battleground among the new corporate titans of the alternative press.
"The outcome, media executives say, may redefine the meaning of
alternative papers and is certain to sharpen journalism in Los
Angeles."
On one side of the battle: James Larkin and Michael Lacey, who'd
built "a Phoenix-based chain of seven nose-thumbing alternative
weeklies with an estimated $50 million in revenue." The newest of
those seven papers was New Times Los Angeles, which was created in
1996 when New Times bought two struggling L.A. alternatives, Los
Angeles View and the L.A. Reader, for $1.5 million each, and
consolidated them into New Times Los Angeles.
And in the other corner, Stern Publishing, the parent company of
the Village Voice, which had bought the L.A. Weekly in 1995.
"The alternative press in L.A. is gutted," said one editor who lost
his job when the View was sold. "Two out-of-state corporations are
running the alternative press. It now resembles the mainstream."
Criticism of the deals wasn't limited to Los Angeles. In San
Francisco, where New Times' SF Weekly competes directly with the
long-time San Francisco Bay Guardian, Bay Guardian publisher Bruce
Brugmann "scorns Mr. Lacey and Mr. Larkin as corporate carpetbaggers
who publish 'cookie cutter' papers," Adelson reported. The SF Weekly
had recently ridiculed the Guardian's "Best of the Bay" campaign with
ads depicting Brugmann's impaled head over the line "Best Head on a
Stick."
But that wasn't the only head New Times had recently collected. "In
Phoenix," Adelson wrote, "New Times published articles credited with
leading to the recent indictment of Arizona's Governor, J. Fife
Symington."
New Times' aim, Lacey told the Times, "was for smart, writer-driven
publications that explain the community you live in."
< < Back to Press Clips
"Cause of the '90s for New Times: Building an Empire,"
Arizona Republic, August 11, 1996
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee at www.azcentral.com)
"For a weekly newspaper with roots in the anti-Vietnam War
movement, the role of corporate raider seems an odd fit," wrote
Arizona Republic staff writer Bill Muller at the start to his piece
about New Times. "But at Phoenix New Times, ringing cash registers
have drowned out Bob Dylan tunes.
"Riding the crest of surging growth in a sea of car-stereo ads and
risque romance personals, New Times Inc. seems intent on building a
coast-to-coast empire of weekly newspapers, all cloned from their
Phoenix parent."
The most recent addition to the New Times chain was New Times Los
Angeles, in a city where New Times would be going head-to-head with
Stern Publishing, owners of the Village Voice.
"The company was built from the ground up by finance guru Jim
Larkin and pugnacious editor Michael Lacey, who has made a career, and
a fortune, by goring the Phoenix estabishment," Muller wrote, adding
that New Times is known for a bare-knuckle, in-your-face arrogance,
personified by the 48-year-old Lacey."
Lacey "started a recent interview by cursing an Arizona Republic
reporter and threatening a lawsuit. After calming down, Lacey
reflected on his empire-building. 'This is flat-out fun,' he said,
flashing a shark-toothed grin."
Lacey told the Republic: "We think that we offer writers the
opportunity to do the kind of journalism they got into this business
to do in the first place."
That kind of journalism costs money--and the Republic noted that
the privately held New Times had significant debts, according to a
confidential 1995 financial report the paper had obtained. (Obtained
illegally, said New Times CEO James Larkin, who demanded that the
Republic return the document.) Still, alternative papers are an
increasingly profitable part of the newspaper industry, and
competition was heating up across the country.
And nowhere was it hotter than in California. "Unlike mainstream
papers, which usually don't write about their competitors," wrote
Muller, "the New Times strategy is to savage their enemies in print.
SF Weekly constantly harangues the Bay Guardian." Observers were
expecting more of the same in Los Angeles.
"In Phoenix," Muller noted, "New Times has been critical of
reporters who work for the Arizona Republic/The Phoenix Gazette, and
the papers have never gotten along very well." In fact, the Republic
had filed a $10 million libel suit against New Times in 1980 for a
story alleging that the paper had bugged the telephones of union
activists.
The suit was dropped in 1982.
< < Back to Press Clips
"Stunts, deception play part in New Times journalism,"
Arizona Republic, August 11, 1996
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee at www.azcentral.com)
"We expect our readers to be able to understand that life is a
mix," New Times executive editor Michael Lacey told the Republic.
"Sometimes it's serious and tragic and sometimes it's funny as a
crutch."
Such as: When Attorney General Grant Woods was happy to pose for
New Times with a hot-dog vendor, who turned out to be an escapee from
the local jail.
Or when state Senator Jan Brewer quoted obsene music lyrics she was
trying to outlaw, and New Times turned it into rap music.
Although such stunts have critics, New Times staff writer John
Dougherty said they don't have much impact on credibility. Nor do
charges that New Times' stories are too black and white.
"I think our voice comes through in stories and I think that's
good," Dougherty told the Republic. "We're not just reciting here's
all the parts of the engine of an automobile, but we're telling people
how it actually runs and how it works and what direction it's going."
< < Back to Press Clips
"Hip and Irreverent, Alternative Papers Grab Readers,"
The Wall Street Journal, July 28, 1997
(The complete text of this article is available for a fee at www.wsj.com)
"Circulation among daily newspapers is in a slow decline," wrote
James P. Miller, staff reporter for the Wall Street Journal. "But
robust growth is the big story in one segment of the newspaper
industry: alternative newspapers. Since 1990, circulation and revenue
have more than doubled among the nation's more than 100 alternatives,
according to a trade group."
Much of that success could be traced to the papers' appeal to
"active urban singles who dismiss daily newspapers as irrelevant,"
Miller noted. "Because of the print pipeline they offer to Generation X
consumers, alternatives are starting to gain national advertising for
liquor, tobacco and breath mints to supplement their local base."
"The newspaper business isn't dying," Jim Larkin, chairman of New
Times Inc., told the Journal. The daily papers "have largely abandoned
their franchise."
As the alternatives become more profitable, "hardball competitive
tactics" have been introduced, the Journal noted. Stern Publishing,
which owns the Village Voice, now had a total of seven alternatives in
its nation-wide chain, having recently added Minneapolis and Seattle
papers; New Times was in the process of starting up its eighth
alternative publication. In Los Angeles, the two alternative
publishers were in a "costly head-to-head fight" between the
Stern-owned LA Weekly and New Times Los Angeles.
But the dailies, too, were paying attention to the success of the
alternatives, and gearing up to go after a piece of their market. In
Chicago, the Sun-Times introduced personal ads, Miller reported; to
compete with alternatives, other dailies had launched Friday
entertainment tabloids.
"The Tribune Co. of Chicago has taken it one step further," he
continued. "The staunchly mainstream operator of big dailies prints
its own alternative, dubbed XS magazine, in Southern Florida's upscale
Broward County." And an official with Sun-Sentinel, the local Tribune
publication that owns XS, had conceded to the Journal that the
newspaper started its weekly to help block the Miami New Times from
moving north.
Instead, New Times decided to start its own Broward County
alternative, set to debut fall 1997.
< < Back to Press Clips
"Rad to Riches: Two Arizona ex-hippie publishers are bringing Texas' weekly papers into the mainstream,"
Texas Monthly, June 1994
(The complete text of this article is not available online)
Jim Larkin and Mike Lacey, owners and operators of New Times Inc., can
trace their media roots back to an anti-war collective that started a
paper in Phoenix 1970. But by 1994, the addition of the Dallas
Observer and the Houston Press to their three-paper chain had made
"these mad-dog press lords from the desert into two of the most
important players in Texas. Not bad for a pair of old lefties,"
reported Joe Nick Patoski in Texas Monthly.
In the interim, Larkin and Lacey had recognized that the declining
number of daily newspapers represented a tremendous opportunity for
weeklies, particularly a "hybrid paper that is not countercultural but
rather niche-oriented, like a radio format." They purchased the
Observer in 1991, in a deal that "neatly coincided" with the closing
of the Dallas Times Herald, and bought the Houston Press two years
later, expanding both papers in circulation and staff.
The typical Larkin-Lacey product, Patoski wrote, "includes a dose
of good writing and strong reporting sandwiched among extensive
restaurant, music and other entertainment listings." The concept
worked well in Dallas, where the New Times-owned Observer had "proved
to be a savvy alternative to the staid and sometimes smug News," he
reported, although the Press "has a longer way to go" to make the same
impact in Houston.
And New Times doesn't plan to stop there. As Lacey told Texas
Monthly: "We can take this anyplace where there are warm, breathing
bodies with IQs that can be measured."
< < Back to Press Clips
"Established Alternatives: A new generation of press barons,"
Quill Magazine, Jan/Feb 1995
(The complete text of this article is not available online)
Twenty-five years after the underground press came up from under and
gave birth to the alternative newspaper industry, "it becomes natural
to compare some of the big guns in the alternative press to the press
barons of yore," wrote Ed Avis in Quill.
For starters, there's Bruce Brugmann, "an American legend of
sorts," who publishes the "gritty, openly advocatory" San Francisco
Bay Guardian--sharing at least geography with William Randolph Hearst.
"The alternative press [is] helping set the new model for American
journalism," Brugmann told Quill.
Then there's Ray Hartmann, who started The Riverfront Times in St.
Louis in 1977. "I'm a straight person who feels very passionately
about gay rights," Hartmann told Avis. "I'm generally sober, let's put
it that way, yet I believe in legalizing pot; I'm a capitalist who
owns a business who advocates social justice issues; and on and on."
There's Ron Williams, who founded the Detroit Metro Times with his
college sweetheart in 1980. "We were journalists, and people concerned
about making this world a better place." William said. "We thought a
nespaper was a potentially very useful tool in this regard."
And then there are Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin, who turned Phoenix
New Times, an anti-war paper founded by a collective in 1970, into a
chain of papers that stretches across the country. New Times, Otis
wrote, "is perhaps the easiest target for accusations of selling
out...But there's simply no evidence the corporatization of the
company has hurt the papers." In fact, he noted, one of the first
things New Times Inc. does when it acquires another weekly is to hire
full-time staff writers--the kind of commitment to quality that
"brought success to New Times in the first place."
< < Back to Press Clips